|
Search -
Finance Home -
Yahoo! -
Help |
|
Quotes & Info
|
| PHX > SEC Filings for PHX > Form 10-Q on 10-Aug-2009 | All Recent SEC Filings |
10-Aug-2009
Quarterly Report
FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS AND RISK FACTORS
Forward-Looking Statements for fiscal 2009 and later periods are made in this
document. Such statements represent estimates by management based on the
Company's historical operating trends, its proved oil and natural gas reserves
and other information currently available to management. The Company cautions
that the Forward-Looking Statements provided herein are subject to all the risks
and uncertainties incident to the acquisition, development and marketing of, and
exploration for oil and natural gas reserves. Investors should also read the
other information in this Form 10-Q and the Company's 2008 Annual Report on Form
10-K where risk factors are presented and further discussed. For all the above
reasons, actual results may vary materially from the Forward-Looking Statements
and there is no assurance that the assumptions used are necessarily the most
likely to occur.
LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES
At June 30, 2009, the Company had positive working capital of $1,810,684, as
compared to positive working capital of $4,599,004 at September 30, 2008. The
decrease in working capital resulted from a large decrease in oil and natural
gas sales receivables, a decrease in refundable income taxes and increases in
prepayment of sales price on assets to be sold, partially offset by a sizable
decrease in accounts payable. Significantly lower oil and natural gas sales
prices received during fiscal 2009 have greatly reduced the Company's
receivables from the sale of oil and natural gas. The lower fiscal 2009 oil and
natural gas sales prices have also been the main factor in decreased drilling
activity, thus reducing the Company's accounts payable. A substantial amount of
the payments made for capital expenditures thus far in 2009 has been for wells
committed to, or which began drilling in fiscal 2008. Refundable income taxes
declined as the Company's fiscal 2008 refund due was received during the quarter
ended March 31, 2009. Prepayment of sales price on assets to be sold increased
as the Company entered into an agreement to sell 67% of its leasehold interests
in the Southeast Leedey field in Dewey County, Oklahoma effective July 1, 2009;
in conjunction therewith, the Company received $2,514,343 as a full prepayment
for the properties on June 26, 2009 (see NOTE 15: Subsequent Events).
The Company's operating cash flow for the first nine months of fiscal 2009
increased to $30,617,545, a 20% increase over the comparable period in fiscal
2008. Fiscal 2009 net cash provided by operating activities, as compared to
fiscal 2008, increased primarily as a result of decreased oil and natural gas
sales receivables, decreased refundable income taxes, decreased derivative
contracts and increased non-cash items of depreciation, depletion and
amortization and provision for impairment, partially offset by a decrease in
deferred income taxes. Additions to properties and equipment for oil and natural
gas activities during the 2009 period were $24,069,809 as compared to
$29,625,707 in the 2008 period. Additions to properties and equipment are
distinct from capital expenditures in that these additions include capital
expenditures and net decrease (increase) in accounts payable for properties and
equipment additions as reflected on the Statements of Cash Flows; therefore,
additions to properties and equipment represent amounts added to properties and
equipment in the period, whereas capital expenditures represent amounts paid in
the period. Depressed natural gas prices are expected by management to continue
through the remainder of fiscal 2009, resulting in reduced operating cash flows
and lower drilling activity, which will result in reduced property and equipment
additions for oil and natural gas activities. Management expects oil prices to
remain relatively stable through the remainder of fiscal 2009; however, since
over 80% of the Company's sales are from the sale of natural gas, oil prices
have a marginal effect on the Company's cash flows. The Company does not operate
any of its oil and natural gas properties and cannot control drilling activity
on its mineral and leasehold acreage, thus low natural gas prices will likely
continue to have a negative impact on the Company's drilling activity, making it
extremely difficult for the Company to predict additions to properties and
equipment with certainty. Therefore, based on management's assessment of current
conditions, fiscal 2009 additions to property and equipment for oil and natural
gas activities are projected to be approximately $32 million; whereas fiscal
2008 additions to property and equipment for oil and natural gas activities were
approximately $53 million.
The industry-wide decline in drilling activity has also created downward
pressure on the costs for drilling rigs, well equipment, and well services,
which is expected to reduce the overall costs of drilling and completing wells.
As lower natural gas prices continue to put downward pressure on drilling
activity, and resulting production declines eventually occur, supply and demand
is expected to come back into balance resulting in increased natural gas prices.
The Company historically funded capital additions, overhead costs and
dividend payments primarily from operating cash flow. However, due to sharp
decreases in oil and natural gas prices during fiscal 2009 and the increased
expenditures for drilling in the prior two years, the Company has utilized its
revolving line-of-credit facility to help fund these expenditures. The Company's
strategy to minimize significant increases in borrowings will be to reduce its
working interest participation in certain large ownership wells or by simply
taking a no cost royalty interest in certain wells. By doing so, the Company
reduces its capital expenditures and thereby limits borrowings, but still
receives the benefit of a relatively high net revenue interest in new wells.
Even with this strategy, and given current drilling activity, temporary moderate
increases in borrowing can occur while the Company awaits the receipt of first
revenues (which normally is 4 to 6 months after production begins) on recently
completed wells. Several wells that have been recently completed will provide
additional cash flow to the Company during the fourth quarter of fiscal 2009 as
the first payments on these wells are received. Debt levels should remain
reasonably stable through the remainder of fiscal 2009 as these first revenues
are received and the effects of the managed drilling activity reduces cash
expenditures. During the fiscal 2009 third quarter the Company was able to
increase its borrowing base under its revolving credit facility from $25 million
to $35 million, providing substantial availability of funds, should the need
arise. The Company also is well within compliance on all of its debt covenants
(current ratio, debt to EBITDA, tangible net worth and dividends as a percent of
operating cash flow).
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
THREE MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 2009 - COMPARED TO THREE MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 2008
Overview:
The Company recorded a third quarter 2009 net loss of $928,512, or $.11 per
share, as compared to a net income of $6,468,885 or $.76 per share in the 2008
quarter. The contributing factors to the recorded loss for the period are
decreased revenue due to depressed oil and natural gas prices and increased
DD&A. The increase in DD&A is the result of increased oil and natural gas
production in the 2009 quarter and lower oil and natural gas reserves (resulting
from significantly lower oil and natural gas prices in the 2009 quarter) as
compared to the 2008 quarter. Expected reserves per well decrease when product
prices decline as the lower prices result in wells reaching their economic
limits earlier in time, thus shortening the wells' economic lives and increasing
the DD&A rate per mcfe of production.
Revenues:
Total revenues decreased $9,673,246 or 52% for the 2009 quarter. The decrease
was the result of an $11,493,696 decrease in oil and natural gas sales partially
offset by positive changes of $1,815,815 related to the fair value of natural
gas derivative contracts. Lower revenues from oil and natural gas sales resulted
from a decrease of 68% in natural gas sales prices to $2.96 per mcf and a
decrease of 55% in oil sales prices to $53.89. Although sales prices steeply
declined, the negative effect on revenues was mitigated by increases in both oil
and natural gas sales volumes of 7% and 37%, respectively. The table below
outlines the Company's sales volumes and average sales prices for oil and
natural gas for the three month periods of fiscal 2009 and 2008:
BARRELS AVERAGE MCF AVERAGE MCFE AVERAGE
SOLD PRICE SOLD PRICE SOLD PRICE
Three months ended 6/30/09 34,145 $ 53.89 2,442,604 $ 2.96 2,647,474 $ 3.42
Three months ended 6/30/08 31,907 $ 120.92 1,788,462 $ 9.33 1,979,904 $ 10.38
|
The increases in sales volumes are a result of successful drilling in the Company's core areas of the southeast Oklahoma Woodford Shale, the Fayetteville Shale in Arkansas and the Anadarko Basin in western Oklahoma where the Company participates in multiple plays. Contributing to the increased sales volumes, several new wells came on line during the fiscal 2009 quarter in these core areas. Drilling in these areas has, for the most part, stabilized at a relatively low level and is expected to result in fewer new wells coming on line during the remaining three months of fiscal 2009. This will limit the potential for sales volume increases during the last quarter of fiscal 2009.
Sales volumes by quarter for the last five quarters were as follows:
Quarter ended Barrels Sold MCF Sold MCFE Sold
6/30/09 34,145 2,442,604 2,647,474
3/31/09 34,744 2,171,660 2,380,124
12/31/08 30,260 2,313,739 2,495,299
9/30/08 31,375 1,995,333 2,183,583
6/30/08 31,907 1,788,462 1,979,904
|
Gains (Losses) on Natural Gas Derivative Contracts:
Fair value of derivative contracts as of June 30, 2009 was ($923,629) and
$207,745 as of March 31, 2009. The Company had a net loss of $470,974 in the
three months ended June 30, 2009 compared to a loss of $2,286,789 for the three
months ended June 30, 2008. The Company received cash payments under the
contracts of $660,400 during the 2009 quarter and made cash payments of $878,900
during the fiscal 2008 quarter.
Lease Operating Expenses (LOE):
LOE decreased $82,799 or 4% in the 2009 quarter. LOE per mcfe decreased to
$.79 per mcfe in the 2009 quarter, as compared to $1.10 per mcfe in the 2008
quarter. Even though new wells continue to come on line, significantly lower
"value based" fees (primarily gathering, compression and marketing costs) and
lower field services and supplies costs combined to cause both an overall
decrease in LOE and a decrease in LOE per mcfe in the 2009 quarter as compared
to the 2008 quarter. The lower "value based" fees are primarily the result of
lower natural gas prices; such fees are normally calculated as a percentage of
sales value.
Production Taxes:
Production taxes decreased $305,404 or 45% in the 2009 quarter as compared to
the 2008 quarter. The decline in production tax expense is the result of a 56%
decrease in oil and natural gas sales revenues and production tax credits on
horizontal wells drilled in the southeast Oklahoma Woodford Shale and the
Fayetteville Shale in Arkansas.
Exploration Costs:
Exploration costs increased $77,143 or 218% in the 2009 quarter as compared
to the 2008 quarter. The increase is related to a $54,440 increase in leasehold
expiration and abandonment costs in the 2009 quarter as compared to the 2008
quarter. One dry hole was recorded in the 2009 quarter at a cost of
approximately $23,000.
Depreciation, Depletion and Amortization (DD&A):
DD&A increased $2,173,620 or 47% in the 2009 quarter. DD&A per mcfe in the
2009 quarter was $2.59 as compared to $2.36 in the 2008 quarter. A 34% increase
in mcfe produced in the 2009 quarter, vs. the 2008 quarter, accounts for
approximately $1.6 million of the overall DD&A increase. The remaining increase
of approximately $600,000 is attributable to lower oil and natural gas reserve
volumes per well, resulting from lower oil and natural gas prices, and higher
costs for horizontally drilled wells primarily in the Woodford and Fayetteville
Shale areas. These same wells also account for the majority of the 2009
quarter's increase in natural gas production.
Provision for Impairment:
The provision for impairment increased $78,226 in the 2009 quarter. In the
2009 quarter one field was impaired a total of $115,892 as compared to the 2008
quarter which incurred impairment on one field totaling $37,666.
General and Administrative Costs (G&A):
G&A costs increased $9,572 or 1% in the 2009 quarter. The G&A cost variance
is negligible between the 2009 and 2008 quarters. Personnel expenses increased
$19,830 and legal expenses increased $38,751 in the 2009 quarter while
shareholder and stock related expenses decreased $73,189.
Income Taxes:
The 2009 quarter incurred a benefit for income taxes of $1,073,000 as a
result of a pre-tax loss of $2,001,512 as compared to a provision for income
taxes of $3,018,000 in the 2008 quarter as a result of pre-tax income of
$9,486,885. The resulting effective tax benefit rate in the 2009 quarter was 54%
as compared to an effective tax provision rate of 32% in the 2008 quarter. The
Company's utilization of excess percentage depletion (which is a permanent tax
benefit) increased the tax benefit in the 2009 quarter, whereas it decreased the
provision for income taxes in the 2008 quarter. The effect of this permanent tax
benefit is that the effective tax rate is increased when recording a benefit for
income taxes as in the fiscal 2009 quarter, while reducing the effective tax
rate when recording a provision for income taxes as in the fiscal 2008 quarter.
The benefit of excess percentage depletion is not directly related to the amount
of a recorded loss or income. Accordingly, in cases where a recorded loss or
income is relatively small, the proportional effect of the excess percentage
depletion on the effective tax rate may become significant.
NINE MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 2009 - COMPARED TO NINE MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 2008
Overview:
The Company recorded a nine month period 2009 net loss of $2,748,397, or $.33
per share, as compared to a net income of $12,780,473 or $1.50 per share in the
2008 period. The recorded loss is primarily the result of decreased revenue
caused by low oil and natural gas prices and an increase in DD&A. DD&A increased
due to oil and natural gas production increases in the 2009 period and lower oil
and natural gas reserves (resulting from significantly lower oil and natural gas
prices in the 2009 period) as compared to the 2008 period. Expected reserves per
well decrease when oil and natural gas prices decline as the lower prices result
in wells reaching their economic limits earlier in time, thus shortening the
wells' economic lives and increasing the DD&A rate per mcfe of production.
Revenues:
Total revenues decreased $15,930,554 or 36% for the fiscal 2009 period as
compared to the fiscal 2008 period. Lower revenues from oil and natural gas
sales resulted from a 57% decrease in natural gas sales prices to $3.36 per mcf
and a 51% decrease in oil sales prices to $48.81 per bbl. Although prices
declined steeply, an increase in natural gas sales volumes of 40% partially
offset the negative effect on revenues. The table below outlines the Company's
sales volumes and average sales prices for oil and natural gas for the nine
month periods of fiscal 2009 and 2008:
BARRELS AVERAGE MCF AVERAGE MCFE AVERAGE
SOLD PRICE SOLD PRICE SOLD PRICE
Nine months ended 6/30/09 99,149 $ 48.81 6,928,003 $ 3.36 7,522,897 $ 3.74
Nine months ended 6/30/08 101,027 $ 100.12 4,932,704 $ 7.82 5,538,866 $ 8.79
|
The increases in natural gas sales volumes are a result of successful
drilling in the Company's core areas of the southeast Oklahoma Woodford Shale,
the Fayetteville Shale in Arkansas and the Anadarko Basin in western Oklahoma
where the Company participates in multiple plays. Contributing to the increased
natural gas sales volumes, several new wells came on line during the fiscal 2009
nine months in these core areas. Drilling in these areas has, for the most part,
stabilized at a relatively low level and is expected to result in fewer new
wells coming on line during the remaining three months of fiscal 2009. This will
limit the potential for sales volume increases during the last quarter of fiscal
2009.
Gains (Losses) on Natural Gas Derivative Contracts:
The Company's fair value of derivative contracts was ($923,629) as of
June 30, 2009 and $646,193 as of September 30, 2008. The Company had a net gain
of $212,578 in the nine months ended June 30, 2009 compared to a loss of
$4,391,316 for the nine months ended June 30, 2008. The Company received cash
payments of $1,782,400 for the 2009 period and made payments of $777,900 for the
2008 period.
Lease Operating Expenses (LOE):
LOE increased $795,250 or 16% in the 2009 period as compared to the 2008
period. LOE per mcfe decreased in the fiscal 2009 period to $.77 per mcfe, as
compared to $.90 per mcfe in the 2008 period. The accumulation of new wells
which have come on line during the last year has resulted in an overall increase
in LOE. The decrease on a per mcfe basis is due to the decrease in natural gas
sales prices resulting in lower "value based" fees (primarily gathering and
marketing costs) which are charged as a percent of natural gas sales, combined
with declining prices for field services and supplies.
Production Taxes:
Production taxes decreased $1,314,125 or 54% in the 2009 period as compared
to the 2008 period. The decline in production tax expense is the result of a 42%
decrease in oil and natural gas sales revenues and production tax credits on
horizontal wells drilled in the southeast Oklahoma Woodford Shale and the
Fayetteville Shale in Arkansas.
Exploration Costs:
Exploration costs decreased $82,280 or 21% in the 2009 period as compared to
the 2008 period. The decrease is primarily related to a decrease in leasehold
expiration and abandonment costs in the 2009 period as compared to the 2008
period of approximately $150,000. Three dry holes were recorded in the 2009
period at a cost of approximately $59,000; no dry holes were recorded in the
fiscal 2008 period.
Depreciation, Depletion and Amortization (DD&A):
DD&A increased $7,506,059 or 56% in the 2009 period as compared to the 2008
period. DD&A was $2.78 per mcfe in the 2009 period as compared to $2.41 per mcfe
in the 2008 period. A 36% increase in total mcfe produced in the 2009 period,
vs. the 2008 period, accounts for approximately $4.8 million of the overall DD&A
increase. The remaining increase of approximately $2.7 million is attributable
to the increase in DD&A per mcfe which is related to lower oil and natural gas
reserve volumes per well resulting from lower oil and natural gas prices, and
higher costs for horizontally drilled wells primarily in the Woodford and
Fayetteville Shale areas. These same wells also account for the majority of the
2009 period's increase in natural gas production.
Provision for Impairment:
The provision for impairment increased $1,738,461 in the 2009 period as
compared to the 2008 period. Driven by depressed oil and natural gas prices,
impairment has been recorded on 19 fields during the 2009 period in the amount
of $2,124,133. Two of the fields accounted for $1,729,034 of the impairment, one
field in Wheeler County, Texas consisting of one deep well (drilled in 2006 and
had mechanical issues during completion which dramatically increased costs) was
impaired $1,070,129 and one mature field in Beckham County, Oklahoma principally
consisting of wells drilled in 2006 and prior was impaired $658,905. The Company
did not incur any impairment in the three primary areas of operation (Woodford
Shale area, Fayetteville Shale area and the Dill City project). During the 2008
period, seven fields were impaired a total of $385,672.
General and Administrative Costs (G&A):
G&A costs decreased $270,496 or 7% in the 2009 period as compared to the 2008
period due to decreased personnel related costs of approximately $378,000, which
included a decrease in employee bonus costs of approximately $500,000 in the
2009 period (the result of beginning to ratably accrue for estimated 2008 annual
employee bonuses during the 2008 fiscal period due to specific bonus performance
criteria being established plus recording the full 2007 annual discretionary
bonuses approved and paid during the 2008 fiscal period), partially offset by
increases in legal fees of approximately $94,000.
Income Taxes:
The fiscal 2009 period incurred a benefit for income taxes of $2,278,000 as a
result of a pre-tax loss of $5,026,397 as compared to a provision for income
taxes of $6,317,000 in the fiscal 2008 period as a result of pre-tax income of
$19,097,473. The resulting effective tax benefit rate in the fiscal 2009 period
was 45% as compared to an effective tax provision rate of 33% in the fiscal 2008
period. The Company's utilization of excess percentage depletion (which is a
permanent tax benefit) increased the tax benefit in the fiscal 2009 period,
whereas it decreased the provision for income taxes in the fiscal 2008 period.
The effect of this permanent tax benefit is that the effective tax rate is
increased when recording a benefit for income taxes as in the fiscal 2009
period, while reducing the effective tax rate when recording a provision for
income taxes as in the fiscal 2008 period. The benefit of excess percentage
depletion is not directly related to the amount of a recorded loss or income.
Accordingly, in cases where a recorded loss or income is relatively small, the
proportional effect of the excess percentage depletion on the effective tax rate
may become significant. With the decline in product prices and forecasted loss
in fiscal 2009, the Company established a valuation allowance on certain state
tax net operating loss carryforwards (NOLs) for which the Company no longer
believes are more likely than not to be realized prior to expiration. This
reduced the benefit recognized during the respective period by $278,000.
CRITICAL ACCOUNTING POLICIES
Preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles
generally accepted in the United States requires management to make estimates,
judgments and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets,
liabilities, revenues and expenses, and the disclosure of contingent assets and
liabilities. However, the accounting principles used by the Company generally do
not change the Company's reported cash flows or liquidity. Generally, accounting
rules do not involve a selection among alternatives, but involve a selection of
the appropriate policies for applying the basic principles. Interpretation of
the existing rules must be done and judgments made on how the specifics of a
given rule apply to the Company.
The more significant reporting areas impacted by management's judgments and
estimates are crude oil and natural gas reserve estimation, impairment of
assets, oil and natural gas sales revenue accruals and provision for income tax.
Management's judgments and estimates in these areas are based on information
available from both internal and external sources, including engineers,
geologists, consultants and historical experience in similar matters. Actual
results could differ from the estimates as additional information becomes known.
The oil and natural gas sales revenue accrual is particularly subject to
estimates due to the Company's status as a non-operator on all of its
properties. Production information obtained from well operators is substantially
delayed. This causes the estimation of recent production, used in the oil and
natural gas revenue accrual, to be subject to some variations.
Oil and Natural Gas Reserves
Management considers the estimation of crude oil and natural gas reserves to
be the most significant of its judgments and estimates. These estimates affect
the unaudited standardized measure disclosures, as well as DD&A and impairment
calculations. Changes in crude oil and natural gas reserve estimates affect the
Company's calculation of depreciation, depletion and amortization, provision for
abandonment and assessment of the need for asset impairments. On an annual
basis, with a semi-annual update, the Company's consulting engineer (Pinnacle
Energy Services, LLC), with assistance from Company staff, prepares estimates of
crude oil and natural gas reserves based on available geologic and seismic data,
reservoir pressure data, core analysis reports, well logs, analogous reservoir
performance history, production data and other available sources of engineering,
geological and geophysical information. However, when significant oil and
natural gas price changes occur between periods in which reserves would normally
be calculated, the Company updates the reserve calculations utilizing a price
deck current with the period. Both DD&A and impairment were calculated in the
2009 quarter based on these updated reserve calculations. As required by the
guidelines and definitions established by the SEC, these estimates are based on
current crude oil and natural gas pricing held flat over the life of the
properties. However, projected future crude oil and natural gas pricing
assumptions are used by management to prepare estimates of crude oil and natural
gas reserves used in formulating management's overall operating decisions. Based
on the Company's fiscal 2008 DD&A, a 10% change in the DD&A rate per mcfe would
result in a corresponding $1,978,466 annual change in DD&A expense. Crude oil
and natural gas prices are volatile and largely affected by worldwide production
and consumption and are outside the control of management.
Successful Efforts Method of Accounting
The Company has elected to utilize the successful efforts method of
accounting for its oil and natural gas exploration and development activities.
Exploration expenses, including geological and geophysical costs, rentals and
exploratory dry holes, are charged against income as incurred. Costs of
successful wells and related production equipment and developmental dry holes
are capitalized and amortized by property using the unit-of-production method as
oil and natural gas is produced. The Company's exploratory wells are all
on-shore and primarily located in the mid-continent area. Generally,
expenditures on exploratory wells comprise significantly less than 10% of the
. . .
|
|