|
Search -
Finance Home -
Yahoo! -
Help |
|
Quotes & Info
|
| PABK > SEC Filings for PABK > Form 10-Q on 10-Aug-2009 | All Recent SEC Filings |
10-Aug-2009
Quarterly Report
The following discussion and analysis of the consolidated financial condition and results of operations of the Company should be read in conjunction with the Consolidated Financial Statements and related Notes included in this Report as well as the Consolidated Financial Statements, related Notes, and Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations included in the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008, and is qualified in its entirety by the foregoing and other more detailed financial information appearing elsewhere herein. Historical results of operations and the percentage relationships among any amounts included, and any trends which may appear to be inferred, should not be taken as being necessarily indicative of trends in operations or results of operations for any future periods.
Our operating subsidiary, The Park Avenue Bank, is a $1.28 billion community bank with 18 branches and two loan production offices in Georgia and Florida. We have offices in both smaller, rural communities as well as larger, metropolitan areas. We provide traditional banking products and services to commercial and individual customers in our markets. Competition, regulation, credit risk and interest rate risk are the primary factors that we must manage in order to be successful.
We generally group our offices into three geographic regions for discussion purposes due to the varying demographics of each market. Our offices in Lowndes, Cook, Decatur, Grady, Bulloch, Appling and Jeff Davis counties are collectively referred to as our "South Georgia" market. Our offices in Henry, Hall, Oconee, and Forsyth counties are collectively referred to as our "North Georgia" market. Our offices in Marion and St. Johns counties are collectively referred to as our "Florida" market. In addition, our corporate assets, correspondent bank account balances, investment portfolio, out-of-market participation loans, insider loans and insider deposits, borrowings, etc. are reported at the corporate level, in what we refer to as the "Treasury". In January 2009, we closed our branch and loan production office in Snellville, Georgia and our branch in Jacksonville, Florida due to the economic downturn and disappointing results from these markets.
The tables below provide summary demographic data on each of our markets.
Number Market
Market/ of Total Total Market Share
County Offices Loans1 Deposits1 Share (%)2 Rank2
South Georgia
Lowndes 4 $ 240,280 $ 264,221 19.4 2
Cook 1 12,575 47,888 26.2 2
Decatur 3 47,244 109,033 32.2 1
Grady 1 13,328 25,468 6.7 5
Appling 1 14,879 39,294 16.0 4
Jeff Davis 1 9,791 52,561 28.0 2
Bulloch 2 34,160 59,964 4.6 6
13 $ 372,257 $ 598,429
North Georgia
Henry 2 $ 221,844 $ 68,570 3.5 8
Hall 1 91,297 28,582 1.0 14
Oconee 1 46,227 13,476 1.8 8
Forsyth 1 54,663 11,877 - -
5 $ 414,031 $ 122,505
Florida
Marion 1 $ 30,433 $ 163,152 3.4 7
St. Johns 1 68,467 1,064 - -
2 $ 98,900 $ 164,216
|
2 Based on the FDIC/OTS Summary of Deposits report as of June 30, 2008.
Median 2008
Market/ Total Population Employment Unemployment Household
County Population1 Growth (%)2 Growth (%)3 Rate (%)4 Income ($)5
Selected Georgia Counties:
South Georgia:
Appling 17,975 3.19 (5.0 ) 9.2 36,331
Bulloch 67,245 20.12 (5.1 ) 8.3 36,805
Cook 16,662 5.65 (5.1 ) 12.2 33,143
Decatur 29,732 5.28 (5.1 ) 11.9 35,282
Grady 25,305 6.96 (5.1 ) 9.2 34,959
Jeff Davis 13,235 4.34 (5.2 ) 13.2 32,660
Lowndes 104,738 13.70 (5.2 ) 7.8 41,368
North Georgia:
Forsyth 175,192 78.03 (5.3 ) 7.8 95,141
Hall 186,789 34.11 (5.2 ) 8.6 57,026
Henry 202,104 69.35 (5.3 ) 8.7 73,113
Oconee 34,510 31.59 (5.1 ) 5.6 67,570
State of Georgia 9,932,949 21.33 (5.3 ) 9.1 56,752
Selected Florida Counties:
Marion 341,870 32.04 (5.2 ) 12.0 39,870
St. Johns 188,194 52.84 (5.2 ) 8.1 66,135
State of Florida 19,021,613 19.02 (4.3 ) 9.3 50,509
National Total 309,731,508 10.06 (3.5 ) 8.8 54,749
|
FINANCIAL CONDITION
During the six months ended June 30, 2009, our total assets decreased $73.0 million, or 10.9% on an annualized basis, to $1.28 billion. Our loan portfolio decreased $37.0 million, or 7.8% on an annualized basis, to $919.7 million at June 30, 2009 from $956.7 million at December 31, 2008. Total deposits decreased $87.3 million, or 15.7% on an annualized basis, to $1.036 billion at June 30, 2009 from $1.124 billion at December 31, 2008. The decrease in total deposits is primarily the result of a $72.5 million decrease in brokered deposits, a $26.0 million dollar decrease in retail-in-market time deposits and a $6.7 million decrease in interest-bearing demand and savings accounts, offset by a $17.2 million increase in noninterest-bearing deposits. During the first quarter of 2009, the Bank issued $20 million of 3-year unsecured debt under the FDIC's Temporary Liquidity Guarantee Program.
2 Estimated percentage population change from 2000 to 2009 provided by SNL Financial.
3 Total employment growth (not seasonally adjusted) for the Second Quarter 2009 year-to-date percentage change from the prior year's year-to-date data provided by the Bureau of Labor Statistics Household Survey.
4 Unemployment rate (not seasonally adjusted) for the First Quarter 2009 provided by the Bureau of Labor Statistics.
5 Based on actual 2008 market demographics provided by SNL Financial.
The following table summarizes our loan and deposit portfolios classified by type and market as of June 30, 2009.
South North
As of June 30, 2009 Georgia Georgia Florida Treasury Total
(Dollars in Thousands)
Loans
Commercial and financial $ 30,994 $ 45,485 $ 2,024 $ 6,096 $ 84,599
Agricultural (including loans
secured by farmland) 35,931 3,360 6,483 - 45,774
Real estate - construction 74,154 158,161 56,024 2,610 290,949
Real estate - commercial 93,038 157,735 25,062 9,896 285,731
Real estate - residential 126,164 43,651 9,334 3,925 183,074
Installment loans to
individuals and other loans 11,795 5,799 137 12,059 29,790
372,076 414,191 99,064 34,586 919,917
Deferred loan fees and unearned
interest, net 181 (160 ) (164 ) (76 ) (219 )
372,257 $ 414,031 $ 98,900 $ 34,510 $ 919,698
Allowance for loan losses (5,143 ) (10,917 ) (3,229 ) (430 ) (19,719 )
Net loans $ 367,114 403,114 95,671 34,080 899,979
Percentage of total 40.8 % 44.8 % 10.6 % 3.8 % 100.0 %
Deposits
Noninterest-bearing demand $ 71,983 $ 18,579 $ 3,517 $ 14,894 $ 108,973
Interest-bearing demand and
savings 194,395 25,803 24,496 765 245,459
Retail time less than $100,000 180,185 46,699 93,479 471 320,834
Retail time greater than or
equal to $100,000 121,188 27,730 42,724 210 191,852
Retail time placed in CDARs
program 30,678 3,694 - 818 35,190
Brokered - - - 134,074 134,074
Total deposits $ 598,429 $ 122,505 $ 164,216 $ 151,232 $ 1,036,382
Percentage of total 57.7 % 11.8 % 15.9 % 14.6 % 100.0 %
|
In addition to the geographic concentrations noted in the tables above, we had approximately $76.7 million in loans secured by real estate in Florida to customers of our South Georgia, North Georgia and Treasury offices.
With approximately 17% of our loan portfolio concentrated in residential construction and development loans and an additional 20% of our loan portfolio in residential mortgages, we continuously monitor and evaluate economic trends in our residential real estate markets. Since the second half of 2007, finished housing inventories and the supply of vacant developed lots have continued to increase in several of our markets in the Atlanta MSA as the number of home sales, new building permits and housing starts have decreased. The table below summarizes, from data available to the Company, the inventory supply trends for housing and vacant developed lots for select counties on the south side of the Atlanta MSA where we have a significant presence in residential real estate construction and development loans and other real estate owned. These statistics are based on estimated absorption rates using actual house sales compared to the number of houses for sale and housing starts and/or building permits compared to the number of vacant developed lots available. The actual absorption periods may differ from these estimates given changes in the future volume of home sales and housing starts.
For the
Quarter
Ended Jun-09 Mar-09 Dec-08 Sep-08 June-08 Jun-07 Jun-06
(Number of Months Supply)
Housing
Inventory:
Henry County 11.9 12.7 14.0 13.8 13.1 10.1 8.4
Clayton
County 18.5 16.7 15.1 11.5 9.9 13.1 10.2
Newton
County 10.4 12.9 14.5 15.3 13.9 8.6 9.0
South Fulton
County 8.7 9.7 9.5 9.3 9.2 8.4 8.4
Vacant
Developed
Lots
Inventory:
Henry County 362.9 348.8 291.0 207.0 153.0 46.0 27.0
Clayton
County 436.8 273.9 169.0 122.0 91.0 30.0 25.0
Newton
County 410.3 399.9 326.0 210.0 142.0 36.0 22.0
South Fulton
County 192.7 161.7 126.0 96.0 83.0 35.0 19.0
|
The table below summarizes our loan portfolio by loan type as of the end of each of the last five quarters.
As of Quarter End Jun-09 Mar-09 Dec-08 Sep-08 Jun-08
(Dollars in Thousands)
Commercial and financial $ 84,599 $ 82,534 $ 87,530 $ 91,401 $ 82,087
Agricultural (including loans
secured by farmland) 45,774 44,671 48,647 49,227 46,891
Real estate - construction 290,949 314,863 315,786 332,901 344,393
Real estate - commercial 285,731 274,338 276,645 281,781 275,962
Real estate - residential 183,074 191,388 196,306 195,439 181,169
Installment loans to
individuals and other loans 29,790 32,740 32,084 32,075 33,237
919,917 940,534 956,998 982,824 963,739
Deferred loan fees and unearned
interest, net (219 ) (255 ) (310 ) (253 ) (239 )
919,698 940,279 956,688 982,571 963,500
Allowance for loan losses (19,719 ) (20,403 ) (19,374 ) (20,240 ) (14,303 )
$ 899,979 $ 919,876 $ 937,314 $ 962,331 $ 949,197
|
The percentage of loans outstanding by loan type at the indicated dates is presented in the following table:
As of Quarter End Jun-09 Mar-09 Dec-08 Sep-08 Jun-08
Commercial and financial 9.20 % 8.78 % 9.15 % 9.30 % 8.52 %
Agricultural (including loans
secured by farmland) 4.98 % 4.75 % 5.08 % 5.01 % 4.87 %
Real estate - construction 31.63 % 33.49 % 33.01 % 33.88 % 35.74 %
Real estate - commercial 31.07 % 29.18 % 28.92 % 28.68 % 28.64 %
Real estate - residential 19.90 % 20.35 % 20.52 % 19.89 % 18.80 %
Installment loans to
individuals and other loans 3.24 % 3.48 % 3.35 % 3.27 % 3.45 %
100.02 % 100.03 % 100.03 % 100.03 % 100.02 %
Deferred loan fees and unearned
interest, net -0.02 % -0.03 % -0.03 % -0.03 % -0.02 %
Total loans 100.00 % 100.00 % 100.00 % 100.00 % 100.00 %
Allowance for loan losses -2.14 % -2.17 % -2.03 % -2.06 % -1.48 %
Net loans 97.86 % 97.83 % 97.97 % 97.94 % 98.52 %
|
At June 30, 2009, our loan portfolio was $919.7 million compared to $956.7 million at December 31, 2008, a decrease of $37.3 million, or 4.0%. Since December 31, 2004, the composition of the loan portfolio has shifted as commercial real estate mortgages decreased from 36.9% of our portfolio in 2004 to 31.1% at June 30, 2009, and construction and land development loans increased from 25.8% of our portfolio to 31.6% of our portfolio during that same time. However, it should be noted that construction and land development loans have decreased from 38.3% of our portfolio at December 31, 2007. This increase in construction and land development lending was largely the result of our decision in 2000 to expand into our North Georgia markets. The more recent decrease in construction and development loans is due to management's conscious efforts to reduce the concentration risk in our loan portfolio. Of the $290.9 million in construction and development loans outstanding at June 30, 2009, $158.2 million, or 54.4%, were originated in our North Georgia offices.
Below is a table showing the collateral distribution of our construction and development and commercial real estate loan portfolios at the indicated dates.
June 30, 2009 December 31, 2008 June 30, 2008
$ Amount % to Total $ Amount % to Total $ Amount % to Total
(Dollars in Thousands)
Construction and
development:
Acquisition and
development:
1-4 family
residential $ 119,476 41.1 % $ 129,412 41.0 % $ 132,885 38.6 %
Commercial and
multi-family 95,245 32.7 % 95,934 30.4 % 103,772 30.1 %
Construction:
1-4 family
residential spec 12,547 4.3 % 19,182 6.1 % 32,985 9.6 %
1-4 family
residential pre-sold 162 0.1 % 112 0.1 % 965 0.3 %
1-4 family
residential other 20,701 7.1 % 23,423 7.4 % 29,165 8.5 %
Commercial
owner-occupied 2,007 0.7 % 3,340 1.0 % 5,123 1.5 %
Commercial not
owner-occupied 28,938 9.9 % 27,038 8.5 % 25,233 7.3 %
Hotel/motel 4,080 1.4 % 7,949 2.5 % 496 0.1 %
Multi-family
properties 5,066 1.7 % - 0.0 % 12,540 3.6 %
Special purpose
property 2,288 0.8 % 6,538 2.1 % 1,229 0.4 %
Other 439 0.2 % 2,858 0.9 % - 0.0 %
Total construction
and development loans $ 290,949 100.0 % $ 315,786 100.0 % $ 344,393 100.0 %
Percentage of total
loans 31.6 % 33.0 % 35.7 %
|
June 30, 2009 December 31, 2008 June 30, 2008
$ Amount % to Total $ Amount % to Total $ Amount % to Total
Commercial real
estate:
Owner-occupied:
Office $ 41,945 14.7 % $ 41,617 15.0 % $ 37,100 13.4 %
Retail 19,993 7.0 % 21,062 7.6 % 22,775 8.3 %
Other 41,260 14.4 % 40,413 14.6 % 36,988 13.4 %
Not owner-occupied:
Office 20,892 7.3 % 25,425 9.2 % 27,634 10.0 %
Retail 44,896 15.7 % 36,085 13.1 % 34,629 12.5 %
Other 24,937 8.7 % 24,656 8.9 % 26,883 9.7 %
Other:
Hotel/motel 21,887 7.7 % 15,812 5.7 % 21,197 7.7 %
Industrial 4,502 1.6 % 4,677 1.7 % 4,716 1.7 %
Multi-family
properties 23,043 8.1 % 22,685 8.2 % 26,655 9.7 %
Special purpose
property 41,430 14.5 % 39,240 14.2 % 35,572 12.9 %
Other 946 0.3 % 4,973 1.8 % 1,813 0.7 %
Total commercial real
estate loans $ 285,731 100.0 % $ 276,645 100.0 % $ 275,962 100.0 %
Percentage of total
loans 31.1 % 28.9 % 28.6 %
|
The table below summarizes our deposit portfolio by deposit type as of the end of each of the last five quarters.
As of Quarter End Jun-09 Mar-09 Dec-08 Sep-08 Jun-08
(Dollars In Thousands)
Noninterest-bearing demand $ 108,973 $ 111,472 $ 91,114 $ 101,417 $ 102,909
Interest-bearing demand and
savings 245,459 250,325 252,122 262,723 336,359
Retail time less than $100,000 320,834 330,854 328,329 323,377 292,981
Retail time greater than or
equal to $100,000 191,852 198,768 198,845 182,491 175,914
Retail time placed in CDARs
programs 35,190 53,712 46,690 18,343 -
Brokered 134,074 160,167 206,603 141,493 88,432
Total deposits $ 1,036,382 $ 1,105,298 $ 1,123,703 $ 1,029,844 $ 996,595
|
The percentage of deposits outstanding by deposit type at the indicated dates is presented in the following table:
As of Quarter End Jun-09 Mar-09 Dec-08 Sep-08 Jun-08 Noninterest-bearing demand 10.51 % 10.09 % 8.11 % 9.85 % 10.33 % Interest-bearing demand and savings 23.68 % 22.65 % 22.44 % 25.51 % 33.75 % Retail time less than $100,000 30.96 % 29.93 % 29.22 % 31.40 % 29.40 % Retail time greater than or equal to $100,000 18.51 % 17.98 % 17.69 % 17.72 % 17.65 % Retail time placed in CDARs program 3.40 % 4.86 % 4.15 % 1.78 % - Brokered 12.94 % 14.49 % 18.39 % 13.74 % 8.87 % Total deposits 100.00 % 100.00 % 100.00 % 100.00 % 100.00 % |
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
Net income for the three months ended June 30, 2009 was $342,000, or $0.04 per diluted share, as compared to $1.5 million, or $0.15 per diluted share, during the same period in 2008. The $1.1 million, or 76.7%, decrease in net income is the net result of an $876,000 decrease in net interest income, a $950,000 increase in the provision for loan losses and a $910,000 increase in noninterest expense, offset by a $915,000 increase in other income and a $700,000 decrease in income tax expense. Our return on average assets ("ROA") and return on average equity ("ROE") for the three months ended June 30, 2009 were 0.10% and 1.51%, respectively, compared to a .49% ROA and a 5.96% ROE for the same period in 2008.
Net income for the six months ended June 30, 2009 was $47,000, or $0.01 per diluted share, as compared to $2.8 million, or $0.29 per diluted share, during the same period in 2008. The $2.7 million, or 98.3%, decrease in net income is the net result of a $3.0 million decrease in net interest income, a $1.5 million increase in the provision for loan losses and a $1.2 million increase in other expenses, offset by a $1.4 million increase in other income and a $1.6 million decrease in income tax expense. Our ROA and ROE for the six months ended June 30, 2009 were 0.01% and 0.10%, respectively, compared to a 0.46% ROA and a 5.60% ROE for the same period in 2008.
The reasons for these changes are discussed in more detail below.
Net Interest Income
The primary component of our profitability is net interest income, or the
difference between the interest income earned on assets, primarily loans and
investments, and interest paid on liabilities, primarily deposits and other
borrowed funds. For the three months ended June 30, 2009, our net interest
income on a taxable-equivalent basis was $8.1 million, a 10.8% decrease from the
$9.0 million in net interest income for the second quarter of 2008. The decrease
in net interest income is due to a $1.4 million decrease in interest income,
offset by a $500,000 decrease in interest expense. During the second quarter of
2009, our average earning assets were 7.4% higher compared to the same period in
2008, and the average balances of our interest-bearing liabilities increased by
9.4% to fund the asset growth. Because of economic conditions and illiquidity in
our loan portfolio, we are carrying approximately $80 million in excess
liquidity at a negative net spread that adversely impacted the net interest
margin by 19 basis points during the second quarter of 2009. A portion of the
decrease in interest income is due to an increase in nonaccrual loans, causing
approximately $1.05 million in interest income to not be recognized during the
second quarter of 2009, compared to $804,000 in interest income forgone during
the same period in 2008. The average yield on our earning assets decreased 93
basis points from 6.24% for the second quarter of 2008, to 5.31% for the second
quarter of 2009. However, the average rates paid for our funds only decreased 48
basis points from 3.43% for the second quarter of 2008, to 2.95% for the second
quarter of 2009. As a result, our net interest spread declined by 45 basis
. . .
|
|