|
Search -
Finance Home -
Yahoo! -
Help |
|
Quotes & Info
|
| BEXP > SEC Filings for BEXP > Form 10-Q on 10-Aug-2009 | All Recent SEC Filings |
10-Aug-2009
Quarterly Report
• Leverage Our Engineering and Operational Expertise;
• Capitalize on Exploration Successes Through Disciplined Development Activities;
• Enhance Returns Through Operational Control; and
• Internally Generate an Inventory of High Quality Exploratory Prospects.
Overview of Second Quarter 2009
In May 2009, we completed a public offering of common stock pursuant to a shelf
registration statement. We sold 36,292,117 shares at a price of $2.75 and
received net proceeds of $93.5 million after underwriting fees and offering
expenses. We used the net proceeds from the offering to repay $35 million of our
outstanding indebtedness under our Senior Credit Facility. We are using the
remaining net proceeds to fund our expanded capital budget in 2009 as well as
fund a portion of our 2010 capital budget.
In May 2009, in connection with our common stock offering, we increased our 2009
capital budget to $64.5 million from $37.1 million. The increase in our budget
was used to fund the restart of our operated Bakken and Three Forks drilling
program in the Williston Basin in North Dakota. We anticipate that our revised
2009 budget will allow us to complete three wells that we deferred completing in
early 2009 due to low commodity prices, high service costs and high
differentials. In addition, our expanded 2009 capital budget is anticipated to
allow us to drill two new long lateral horizontal wells in Williams County,
North Dakota. To date, we have completed one of the three wells that we deferred
completing in early 2009 and have commenced drilling one of the two new long
lateral wells. See Item 2. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial
Condition and Results of Operations - Overview of Second Quarter 2009
Operational Results - Rocky Mountain Province - Williston Basin.
Second quarter 2009 oil and natural gas prices, excluding realized and
unrealized derivative hedging results, decreased 60% and 71%, respectively, from
the second quarter 2008. In the second quarter 2009, the average sales price
that we received for oil, excluding realized and unrealized derivative hedging
results, was $49.41 per barrel, which represents a $72.81 per barrel decrease
from that in the second quarter 2008. In the second quarter 2009, the average
sales price that we received for natural gas, excluding realized and unrealized
derivative hedging results, was $3.50 per Mcf, which represents an $8.43 per Mcf
decrease from that in the second quarter 2008.
Our second quarter 2009 production averaged 27.2 MMcfe per day, which represents
a 10% decrease from the second quarter 2008. The natural production decline from
our wells, decreased drilling activity, and the higher than forecasted decline
rates associated with our Bayou Postillion wells in Southern Louisiana led to
reduced production. During the second quarter 2009, our oil volumes increased by
28% to approximately 164,000 barrels versus that in the second quarter 2008 as a
result of our increased activity level in the Williston Basin.
Our second quarter 2009 oil and natural gas revenues, including hedge
settlements but excluding unrealized hedging gains and losses, were down
$21.0 million, or 59%, compared to that in the second quarter 2008. Oil revenues
in the second quarter 2009, including hedge settlements but excluding unrealized
hedging gains and losses, decreased $6.2 million from the second quarter 2008.
Lower oil prices reduced revenues by $11.9 million while both higher production
volumes and hedge settlements increased revenues by $4.4 million and
$1.4 million, respectively. Natural gas revenues in the second quarter 2009,
including hedge settlements but excluding unrealized hedging gains and losses,
decreased $14.9 million compared to the second quarter 2008. Lower natural gas
prices and reduced production volumes decreased revenues $12.3 million and
$5.8 million, respectively, while increased hedge settlements increased revenues
by $3.3 million.
Second quarter 2009 operating income decreased $8.6 million from that in the
second quarter last year. This decrease was attributable to the decline in
commodity prices, natural gas volumes and higher lease operating expense. These
items were partially offset by higher oil volumes and lower depletion, general
and administrative and production tax expenses.
As of June 30, 2009, we had $73.4 million in cash and marketable securities and
$404.4 million in total assets.
Overview of Second Quarter 2009 Operational Results
Rocky Mountain Province
Williston Basin
Following our equity offering in May 2009, we restarted our operated drilling
program in the Williston Basin. In June, we re-entered the Anderson 28-33 #1H
and began drilling the horizontal portion of the wellbore in the Bakken
formation. Currently, we are fracture stimulating the well with 24 stages
planned. The Anderson is located approximately 2 miles west of our Carkuff 22
#1H discovery. We own an approximate 66% working interest and 55% net revenue
interest in the Anderson well.
In late June, we began fracture stimulating the Strobeck 27-34 #1H, which is a
long lateral Three Forks well, with 20 stimulation stages. The Strobeck well is
located approximately one mile west of our operated Carkuff 22 #1H in Mountrail
County, North Dakota. We own an approximate 77% working interest and a 63%
revenue interest in the well.
In late July, we began completion operations on the Figaro 29-32 #1H, which is a
long lateral Bakken well, with 20 stimulation stages. Currently, we are
continuing completion operations. We own an approximate 90% working interest and
a 72% revenue interest in the well.
Onshore Gulf Coast Province
Southern Louisiana
In May 2009, we successfully brought on line our third joint venture well with
Clayton Williams Energy, Inc., the Breton Sound SL 19054 #1. The Breton Sound
well was completed from 60 feet of pay. We own an approximate 50% working
interest and a 39% revenue interest in the well.
Subsequent Events
On July 24, 2009, we entered into the Fifth Amendment to our Senior Credit
Facility. The amendment extended the maturity of the agreement to July 24, 2012,
amended our Interest Coverage Ratio (as defined in the Senior Credit Facility),
added a Net Leverage Ratio (as defined in the Fifth Amendment) and requires us
to maintain $10 million in liquidity until our preferred stock is redeemed in
October 2010. Our Interest Coverage Ratio for the four quarters ended as of
June 30, 2009 and September 30, 2009 must be a minimum of 2.50 to 1.00, for the
four quarters ended as of December 31, 2009 and March 31, 2010 must be a minimum
of 2.00 to 1.00 and for the four quarters thereafter must be a minimum of 2.50
to 1.00. Our Net Leverage Ratio beginning with the quarter ended September 30,
2009 through September 30, 2010 must be not greater than 4.50 to 1.00, ending
December 31, 2010 and March 31, 2011 must be not greater than 4.25 to 1.00 and
thereafter must be not greater than 4.00 to 1.00.
Results for the Three and Six Months Ended June 30, 2009
Comparison of the three month and six month periods ended June 30, 2009 and
2008.
Production volumes
Three months ended June 30, Six months ended June 30,
2009 % Change 2008 2009 % Change 2008
Oil (MBbls) 164 28 % 128 338 38 % 245
Natural gas (MMcf) 1,460 (25 %) 1,947 3,302 (20 %) 4,139
Total (MMcfe)(1) 2,444 (10 %) 2,715 5,328 (5 %) 5,609
Average daily production (MMcfe/d)(2) 27.2 (10 %) 30.2 29.6 (5 %) 31.2
Average daily production (Boe/d)(2) 4,526 (10 %) 5,027 4,933 (5 %) 5,193
|
(1) MMcfe is defined as one million cubic feet equivalent of natural gas, determined using the ratio of six MMcf of natural gas to one MBbl of crude oil, condensate or natural gas liquids.
(2) Average daily production is calculated using 30 days per calendar month.
Natural gas represented 60% of our second quarter 2009 production volumes and 62% of our first six months 2009 production volumes, compared to 72% in the second quarter 2008 and 74% in the first six months 2008.
Revenues, Commodity Prices and Hedging
The following table sets forth our production volumes, the average prices we
received before hedging, the average prices we received including derivative
settlement gains (losses) and the average prices including derivative
settlements and unrealized gains (losses).
Three months ended June 30, Six months ended June 30,
2009 % Change 2008 2009 % Change 2008
Oil revenue:
Oil revenue $ 8,105 (48 %) $ 15,640 $ 14,055 (48 %) $ 26,797
Oil derivative
settlement gains
(losses) (222 ) (86 %) (1,601 ) 860 NM (2,187 )
Oil revenue including
oil derivative
settlements $ 7,883 (44 %) $ 14,039 $ 14,915 (39 %) $ 24,610
Oil derivative
unrealized gains
(losses) (3,034 ) (22 %) (3,897 ) (4,341 ) 5 % (4,135 )
Oil revenue including
derivative settlements
and unrealized gains
(losses) $ 4,849 (52 %) $ 10,142 $ 10,574 (48 %) $ 20,475
Natural gas revenue:
Natural gas revenue $ 5,104 (78 %) $ 23,231 $ 12,963 (70 %) $ 42,584
Natural gas derivative
settlement gains
(losses) 1,508 NM (1,756 ) 7,947 NM (1,232 )
Natural gas revenue
including derivative
settlements $ 6,612 (69 %) $ 21,475 $ 20,910 (49 %) $ 41,352
Natural gas derivative
unrealized gains
(losses) (979 ) (85 %) (6,653 ) (2,550 ) (78 %) (11,809 )
Natural gas revenue
including derivative
settlements and
unrealized gains
(losses) $ 5,633 (62 %) $ 14,822 $ 18,360 (38 %) $ 29,543
Oil and natural gas
revenue:
Oil and natural gas
revenue $ 13,209 (66 %) $ 38,871 $ 27,018 (61 %) $ 69,381
Oil and natural gas
derivative settlement
gains (losses) 1,286 NM (3,357 ) 8,807 NM (3,419 )
Oil and natural gas
revenue including
derivative settlement
gains (losses) 14,495 (59 %) 35,514 35,825 (46 %) 65,962
Oil and natural gas
derivative unrealized
gains (losses) (4,013 ) (62 %) (10,550 ) (6,891 ) (57 %) (15,944 )
Oil and natural gas
revenue including
derivative settlements
and unrealized gains
(losses) 10,482 (58 %) 24,964 28,934 (42 %) 50,018
Other revenue 32 (48 %) 62 66 (16 %) 79
Total revenue $ 10,514 (58 %) $ 25,026 $ 29,000 (42 %) $ 50,097
|
Three months ended June 30, Six months ended June 30,
2009 % Change 2008 2009 % Change 2008
Average oil prices:
Oil price (per Bbl) $ 49.41 (60 %) $ 122.22 $ 41.63 (62 %) $ 109.46
Oil price including derivative
settlement gains (losses) (per
Bbl) 48.06 (56 %) 109.71 44.18 (56 %) 100.53
Oil price including derivative
settlements and unrealized gains
(losses) (per Bbl) $ 29.56 (63 %) $ 79.25 $ 31.32 (63 %) $ 83.64
Average natural gas prices:
Natural gas price (per Mcf) $ 3.50 (71 %) $ 11.93 $ 3.93 (62 %) $ 10.29
Natural gas price including
derivative settlement gains
(losses) (per Mcf) 4.53 (59 %) 11.03 6.33 (37 %) 9.99
Natural gas price including
derivative settlements and
unrealized gains (losses) (per
Mcf) $ 3.86 (49 %) $ 7.61 $ 5.56 (22 %) $ 7.14
Average equivalent prices:
Natural gas equivalent price (per
Mcfe) $ 5.40 (62 %) $ 14.32 $ 5.07 (59 %) $ 12.37
Natural gas equivalent price
including derivative settlement
gains (losses) (per Mcfe) 5.93 (55 %) 13.08 6.72 (43 %) 11.76
Natural gas equivalent price
including derivative settlements
and unrealized gains (losses)
(per Mcfe) $ 4.29 (53 %) $ 9.19 $ 5.43 (39 %) $ 8.92
For the three For the six
month periods month periods
ended June 30, ended June 30, 2009 and
2009 and 2008 2008
Change in revenue from the sale of oil
Volume variance impact $ 4,410 $ 10,154
Price variance impact (11,945 ) (22,896 )
Cash settlement of hedging contracts 1,379 3,047
Unrealized hedge gain or loss 863 (206 )
Total change $ (5,293 ) $ (9,901 )
Change in revenue from the sale of natural gas
Volume variance impact $ (5,813 ) $ (8,603 )
Price variance impact (12,314 ) (21,018 )
Cash settlement of hedging contracts 3,264 9,179
Unrealized hedge gain or loss 5,674 9,259
Total change $ (9,189 ) $ (11,183 )
Change in revenue from the sale of oil and natural gas
Volume variance impact $ (1,403 ) $ 1,551
Price variance impact (24,259 ) (43,914 )
Cash settlement of hedging contracts 4,643 12,226
Unrealized hedge gain or loss 6,537 9,053
Total change $ (14,482 ) $ (21,084 )
|
Second quarter 2009 oil and natural gas revenues including derivative cash
settlements and unrealized gains (losses) decreased $14.5 million when compared
to that in the second quarter 2008. The change in revenues was attributable to
the following:
• a 62% decrease in pre-hedge per Mcfe sales prices resulted in a
$24.3 million decrease in revenues;
• a decrease in natural gas production, which was partially offset by an increase in our oil volumes, resulted in a $1.4 million decrease in oil and natural gas revenues;
• a $1.3 million gain from the settlement of derivative contracts in the second quarter 2009 versus a $3.3 million loss from the settlement of derivative contracts in second quarter 2008 increased revenues by $4.6 million; and
• a $4.0 million unrealized derivative loss in second quarter 2009 versus a $10.5 million unrealized derivative loss in second quarter 2008 increased revenues by $6.5 million.
First six months 2009 oil and natural gas revenues including derivative cash
settlements and unrealized gains (losses) decreased $21.0 million when compared
to that in the first six months 2008. The change in revenues was attributable to
the following:
• a 59% decrease in pre-hedge per Mcfe sales prices resulted in a
$43.9 million decrease in revenues;
• an increase in oil production, which was partially offset by a decrease in our natural gas volumes, resulted in a $1.6 million increase in oil and natural gas revenues;
• an $8.8 million gain from the settlement of derivative contracts in the first six months 2009 versus a $3.4 million loss from the settlement of derivative contracts in first six months 2008 increased revenues by $12.2 million; and
• a $6.8 million unrealized derivative loss in first six months 2009 versus a $15.9 million unrealized derivative loss in first six months 2008 increased revenues by $9.1 million.
Hedging. We utilize collars, three way costless collars and swaps to (i) reduce
the effect of price volatility on the commodities that we produce and sell,
(ii) reduce commodity price risk and (iii) provide a base level of cash flow in
order to assure we can execute at least a portion of our capital spending plans.
The following table details derivative contracts that settled during the second quarter and first six months 2009 and 2008 and includes the type of derivative contract, the volume, the weighted average NYMEX reference price for those volumes, and the associated gain (loss) upon settlement.
Three months ended June 30, Six months ended June 30,
2009 % Change 2008 2009 % Change 2008
Oil collars
Volumes (Bbls) 19,000 (60 %) 47,000 49,000 (47 %) 92,500
Average floor
price ($ per
Bbl) $ 59.63 (13 %) $ 68.18 $ 71.58 10 % $ 64.98
Average ceiling
price ($ per
Bbl) $ 78.70 (13 %) $ 90.91 $ 96.96 10 % $ 88.29
Gain (loss) upon
settlement ($ in
thousands) $ 45 NM $ (1,601 ) $ 1,127 NM $ (2,187 )
Oil swaps
Volumes (Bbls) 30,000 NM - 30,000 NM -
Average swap
price ($ per
Bbl) $ 50.75 NM $ - $ 50.75 NM $ -
Gain (loss) upon
settlement ($ in
thousands) $ (267 ) NM $ - $ (267 ) NM $ -
Total oil
Gain (loss) upon
settlement ($ in
thousands) $ (222 ) (86 %) $ (1,601 ) $ 860 NM $ (2,187 )
Natural gas
collars
Volumes (MMbtu) 250,000 (82 %) 1,370,000 1,220,000 (58 %) 2,890,000
Average floor
price ($ per
MMbtu) $ 6.89 (3 %) $ 7.14 $ 7.74 3 % $ 7.52
Average ceiling
price ($ per
MMbtu) $ 8.19 (14 %) $ 9.54 $ 9.42 (15 %) $ 11.06
Gain (loss) upon
settlement ($ in
thousands) $ 676 NM $ (1,756 ) $ 6,931 NM $ (1,232 )
Natural gas
swaps
Volumes (MMbtu) 882,000 NM - 1,062,000 NM -
Average swap
price ($ per
MMbtu) $ 4.438 NM $ - $ 4.572 NM $ -
Gain (loss) upon
settlement ($ in
thousands) $ 832 NM $ - $ 1,016 NM $ -
Total gas
Gain (loss) upon
settlement ($ in
thousands) $ 1,508 NM $ (1,756 ) $ 7,947 NM $ (1,232 )
|
Other revenue. Other revenue relates to fees that we charge other parties who
use our gas gathering systems that we own to move their production from the
wellhead to first party gas pipeline systems.
Operating costs and expenses
Production costs. We believe that per unit of production measures are the best
way to evaluate our production costs. We use this information to internally
evaluate our performance, as well as to evaluate our performance relative to our
peers.
Unit-of-Production Amount
(Per Mcfe) (In thousands)
Three months ended June 30, Three months ended June 30,
2009 % Change 2008 2009 % Change 2008
Production costs:
Operating & maintenance $ 1.17 56 % $ 0.75 $ 2,853 40 % $ 2,036
Expensed workovers 0.18 20 % 0.15 445 9 % 410
Ad valorem taxes 0.11 175 % 0.04 275 170 % 102
Lease operating expenses $ 1.46 55 % $ 0.94 $ 3,573 40 % $ 2,548
Production taxes 0.34 (36 %) 0.53 831 (42 %) 1,441
Production costs $ 1.80 22 % $ 1.47 $ 4,404 10 % $ 3,989
|
Second quarter 2009 per unit of production costs increased $0.33 per Mcfe, or
22%, when compared to that in the second quarter last year mainly due to the
following:
• O&M expense increased $0.42 per Mcfe, or 56%, due to an increase in
compressor rental and maintenance, electricity, salt water disposal,
surface equipment repair and well service and repair; and
• production taxes decreased $0.19 per Mcfe, or 36%, due to lower commodity prices.
Unit-of-Production Amount
(Per Mcfe) (In thousands)
Six months ended June 30, Six months ended June 30,
2009 % Change 2008 2009 % Change 2008
Production costs:
Operating & maintenance $ 1.07 55 % $ 0.69 $ 5,697 48 % $ 3,858
Expensed workovers 0.21 (5 %) 0.22 1,125 (8 %) 1,224
Ad valorem taxes 0.10 25 % 0.08 550 22 % 452
Lease operating expenses $ 1.38 39 % $ 0.99 $ 7,372 33 % $ 5,534
Production taxes 0.31 (37 %) 0.49 1,645 (40 %) 2,724
Production costs $ 1.69 14 % $ 1.48 $ 9,017 9 % $ 8,258
|
First six months 2009 per unit of production costs increased $0.21 per Mcfe, or
14%, when compared to the first six months last year mainly due to the
following:
• O&M expense increased $0.38 per Mcfe, or 55%, due to an increase in
compressor rental and maintenance, electricity, and salt water disposal;
and
• production taxes decreased $0.18 per Mcfe, or 37%, due to lower commodity prices.
General and administrative expenses. We capitalize a portion of our general and administrative costs. Capitalized costs include the cost of technical employees who work directly on capital projects and a portion of our associated technical organization costs such as supervision, telephone and postage.
Three months ended June 30, Six months ended June 30,
. . .
|
|
|